![]()
American Unitarian Conference™
![]()
Promoting the American Unitarian
Tradition
| Back to the American Unitarian page |
On Being Non-Sectarian D. Dulin Houston, Texas
|
|
Many sought to push William Ellery Channing and others out of their
Christian fellowships for holding beliefs that were outside of the norm.
The intellectual and doctrinal freedom that nineteenth century Bostonian
Christians were said to have extended to each other did not go far
enough. And perhaps, as a result of the controversy, it eventually went
too far. In any case, Channing's Unitarianism was not welcome in his
day. So those who adhered to it were denied fellowship by some ministers
and congregations. In a sense, the Unitarians were excluded from
conversation about God. Imagine, for just a moment, that you are sitting
down with a group of people and you are all talking about God. Imagine
that it's your turn to speak, and all of a sudden you find yourself
being asked to leave the discussion for expressing a minority view. Not
only are you asked to cease talking, you are also asked to physically
leave the group and go mingle some place else. Can you imagine that?
That is exactly what happened to Channing and his like. They were asked
to seek communion some place else. We know the rest of the story about how Unitarianism developed in America.
Many of us can quote or paraphrase the famous words of Channing, Clarke,
Emerson, and other religious forefathers. But I think somewhere in the
middle of all that history-making we have lost track of something. We
have forgotten to avoid the pitfall of sectarian strife. I think this is
what happened to the Unitarians who walked in Channing's shadow. They
became so preoccupied with their own ideas about God that they either
ignored or looked down upon their Trinitarian Christian brothers and
sisters. They preached Christ's ethical precepts from the mountaintops,
and rightly so, but they lacked his humility to meet their brethren in
the valley, and they did not hear his call for unity. The Psalmist writes, "Behold, how good and how pleasant it is for
brethren to dwell together in unity" (Psalm 133:1). Channing may
have had this line of scripture on his mind towards the end of his life.
He had seen his church condemned by those who viewed themselves as
"true Christians," become a Unitarian Christian haven, and
then further down the line, a part of the larger Unitarian movement that
would radically splinter off from its Christian roots. He wrote to a
friend, “I distrust sectarian influences more and more. I am more
detached from a denomination, and strive to feel more my connection with
the Universal Church, with all its good and holy men” (Wright, Conrad.
1989. A Stream of
Light. Boston: Skinner House Books. Pages 30-32.). The “Prophet of Unitarianism” doubted the importance of his
denominational ties. It was the Christian name that Channing prized
above all else. He was a Christian who happened to have a Unitarian
theology. But theology was a lesser concern for him. Channing craved
Christian unity. This concern is as relevant today as ever. Christianity
is just as populated with sectarian conflicts and divisions now as it
was then. But there is hope in Channing's weariness over “sectarian
influences.” Throughout his ministry he spoke of the Universal Church.
He considered himself and all Unitarians a part of the global church
founded by Christ and sustained by the Holy Spirit of God. Channing did
not demand strict allegiance to his views. He would have broken bread
with any sincere Christian believer and any sincere spiritual seeker.
Likewise, neither should we split off from one another over differences
of opinion. To dwell together in unity – how good and pleasant indeed. As a Christian I can say that the American Unitarian
Conference is in a unique position because it fosters both Christian and
non-Christian unity. It offers the gift of mutual fellowship minus the
curse of sectarian bickering. The AUC provides a service to those who
share a Unitarian theology. It allows those with similar views about God to fellowship with one
another and to encourage one another. Although it began as a
counter-movement to modern Unitarian Universalism, the emphasis is not
on division. It is on unity (which ties in with the word Unitarian). It
is truly a part of the Universal Church. While expressing Unitarian
ideas, it does not wish to sever the bonds of brotherhood we have with
the other churches and denominations. Let it be our prayer that as we
fellowship with one another we do not repeat the mistakes of our past.
|