08-17-2007, 12:14 AM
Very interesting....if confirmed...a fundamental law of relativity could be broken....science, like religion, must be open to new facts....
http://www.dailytech.com/German+Scientis...le8487.htm
"Günter Nimtz and Alfons Stahlhofen of the University of Koblenz, Germany, have been researching a phenomenon known as quantum tunnelling. Two prisms are placed together. When a light is shown through the prisms, a detector picks up the light and records information about the photon. However, when the two prisms are separated, Nimtz and Stahlhofen discovered that photons would occasionally "tunnel" between the prisms -- arriving at the detector sooner than should theoretically be possible."
"Being able to violate the speed of light would undermine our current understand of space and time, and lead to a number of bizarre effects, such as being able to travel backwards in time."
Other scientists argue that "even though the quantum wave packet may have exceeded the speed of light" since no information was delivered at that speed the cosmic speed limit theory is safe.....> I'll let the braniacs argue that one.....:>
http://www.dailytech.com/German+Scientis...le8487.htm
"Günter Nimtz and Alfons Stahlhofen of the University of Koblenz, Germany, have been researching a phenomenon known as quantum tunnelling. Two prisms are placed together. When a light is shown through the prisms, a detector picks up the light and records information about the photon. However, when the two prisms are separated, Nimtz and Stahlhofen discovered that photons would occasionally "tunnel" between the prisms -- arriving at the detector sooner than should theoretically be possible."
"Being able to violate the speed of light would undermine our current understand of space and time, and lead to a number of bizarre effects, such as being able to travel backwards in time."
Other scientists argue that "even though the quantum wave packet may have exceeded the speed of light" since no information was delivered at that speed the cosmic speed limit theory is safe.....> I'll let the braniacs argue that one.....:>