American Unitarian Conference Forum

Full Version: 3 Forms of Unitarianism?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
It seems to me that one can be a Unitarian in 3 ways.  They are as follows:

(1) Christian.  This however is a form of Christianity that is utterly different from the orthodox religion that bears the same name.  Call it liberal, free, progressive, rational or what have you, it is very clearly not the same, given the absence of doctrine (besides the obvious Trinity/Deity of Christ other factors such as the view of the Bible, exclusivism, the Atonement, Eternall Hell, etc, are notably absent).

(2) Universal Theist. This would be similar to the form of Unitarianism espoused by Rev. Dorris, a post-religion religion that is monotheistic to the core but not sectarian.  It is a simple faith that seeks out the best from the other religions of the world.

(3) Deism/Transcendentalism. I lumped these two together since for all intents and purposes they both represnt a similar impulse: The belief that "religion" is best known from the individual (the only different being really that Deism is reason (left-brain) centered, whereas transcendentalism is more mystical/intuition/emotion (right-brain) centered.  For this form of Unitarianism no outside source is needed.

Am I correct in this assessment?  I notice a gradual pattern here, as well: Unitarian Christianity reveres Jesus as the source, Universal Theism looks to all sources, and Deism views the individual's own attributes (and creation as a whole) as sufficient.  Yet each is an element, very basic, faith.

Thoughts?
Personally I lump 2 and 3 together to describe myself; and I think there is no conflict between reason and intuition, at least not for me. In any case, this seems like a reasonable assessment of Unitarian thought.
I agree with your assessment. I guess most of us on this list wouldn't consider atheism or anything derivative of it as Unitarian. I've met neopagans who seem to be one God oriented, and would consider them Unitarian. Perhaps they sort of fit into categoreies two and three.

By this standard, we have no Unitarian chuches in Minnesota. Some would argue that one of the thirty or so UU chuches comes close, but it isn't close enough for me. Of course, trying to open a discussion on this isn't the quickest way to make friends in UU circles.

John
Hi Logan,

It has been a long time since my views were place in the middle of a list of ways or beliefs.
Thanks.

With love,

Rev Dorris
Reference URL's